Since improper integrals are defined using a limit, most properties valid for definite (Riemann) integrals are still true. In particular we have:
(i) For all functions f,g and real numbers k we have
(ii) For all functions f and real numbers
a < b < cwe have
Each of these inequalities is understood in the following sense: If integral(s) on one side are convergent, then so are the ones on the other side and the two sides are equal.
(iii) Assume that f and g are functions whose integrals from a to b converge. If
f ≤ gon (a,b),then
The third property is a basis for a test of convergence based on comparison. This will be explained in the next section, however, we already see that it should be possible to somehow rank functions according to how well their integrals converge. This topic will be addressed now. We know that for positive functions there are essentially two kinds of problems, integrals to infinity and vertical asymptotes. We will start with the former.
In the previous section (Introduction to improper integrals) we showed that
The scale of powers is perhaps the most important and we will look at them in general. Since we know that to have any hope of a convergent integral at infinity, the integrated function should tend to zero, it is natural to look at powers in the following form:
The limit converges if and only if
Fact (scale of powers, p-test).
This picture should be helpful:
The area under the graph of
This may be the right moment to note the difference in terminology and
meaning. Although the function
Note also another important thing. The convergence or divergence of the above integrals cannot be influenced by the choice of the lower limit (as long as it is greater than zero). This is quite natural, since these functions have no problems other than 0 and infinity. If we remove a finite region from a region of infinite area, the resulting region will still have infinite area. Similarly, we cannot "spoil" a region of finite area by adding/subtracting a finite region. This in fact follows from the property (ii) above. Of course, if we, for instance, decide to integrate the above powers from 2 to infinity, the convergent ones will have different answers (but cannot become infinity).
We again look at the easiest case, assuming that
This time, the limit exists if and only if
Thus we have the following picture:
Again, the function
There are functions that look similar and have convergent integrals both at 0 and at infinity; in other words, if we integrate them from 0 to infinity (which then must be done by splitting it into two integrals), it comes out convergent. The above considerations show that simple powers would not do this, one has to try something more complicated.
Problems at other places can be explored similarly. The situation at negative infinity is about the same as at infinity (with the difference that not all powers are defined on the negative half-axis). Also the behaviour at zero from the left is the same as the behaviour at zero from the right, with the same problem of some powers not being defined there. Vertical asymptotes at other points are mere shifts of the vertical asymptote situation at zero. Thus, for instance,
but now this is only true for p's for which the power is defined on
Back to Theory - Improper Integrals